RIARTE Principal
    • español
    • English
  • español 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   RIARTE Principal
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Artículos en revistas científicas
  • Ver ítem
  •   RIARTE Principal
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Artículos en revistas científicas
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A diagnosis of construction and demolition waste generation and recovery practice in the European Union

Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/1562
ISSN: 9596526
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118400
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Villoria Sáez, Paola; Osmani, Mohamed
Fecha
2019
Materia/s

Residuos de Construcción Demolición (RCD)

Directiva marco de residuos

Gestión de residuos

Unión Europea

Impuestos

Vertedero

Gestión de costes

Materia/s Unesco

3308.02 Residuos Industriales

5312.03 Construcción

5311.02 Gestión Financiera

Resumen

Construction and demolition activities in the European Union (EU) are responsible for generating 850 million tonnes of construction and demolition waste (CDW) per year. As a result, the Waste Framework Directive (WFD) set a recovery target to attain 70% CDW recycling by 2020. CDW management in individual EU Member States (MS) has been widely explored by previous researchers, however little attention has been paid to investigate the association of CDW arising with national economic, social and technological factors across different countries. Hence, this paper set out to examine and compare CDW generation across EU MS in correlation with their respective national construction turnover, gross domestic product and capita. It also assesses policy framework and CDW recovery performance of each MS against the WFD recovery target. Statistical data reported by Eurostat were collected and further analysed. A critical assessment of Eurostat CDW data reliability was carried out. A novel approach was adopted by ranking MS in respect to the amount of CDW generated per ‘construction turnover, GDP and capita’ (CDW-TGC). Results show that Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium and France were found to be the highest CDW-TGC producers, whereas Croatia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Poland, Portugal and Spain were found to be the lowest. Further, most MS rely on ‘waste management plans’ rather than specific national CDW regulations. No correlation was found between landfill taxation and CDW landfilled or recovered. Eleven MS still need to improve their recovery performance to achieve the WFD target. Finally, four key CDW recovery challenges were identified: ineffective CDW regulations, incoherent data quality, undeveloped reverse logistics and a low market readiness for secondary materials. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Construction and demolition activities in the European Union (EU) are responsible for generating 850 million tonnes of construction and demolition waste (CDW) per year. As a result, the Waste Framework Directive (WFD) set a recovery target to attain 70% CDW recycling by 2020. CDW management in individual EU Member States (MS) has been widely explored by previous researchers, however little attention has been paid to investigate the association of CDW arising with national economic, social and technological factors across different countries. Hence, this paper set out to examine and compare CDW generation across EU MS in correlation with their respective national construction turnover, gross domestic product and capita. It also assesses policy framework and CDW recovery performance of each MS against the WFD recovery target. Statistical data reported by Eurostat were collected and further analysed. A critical assessment of Eurostat CDW data reliability was carried out. A novel approach was adopted by ranking MS in respect to the amount of CDW generated per ‘construction turnover, GDP and capita’ (CDW-TGC). Results show that Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium and France were found to be the highest CDW-TGC producers, whereas Croatia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Poland, Portugal and Spain were found to be the lowest. Further, most MS rely on ‘waste management plans’ rather than specific national CDW regulations. No correlation was found between landfill taxation and CDW landfilled or recovered. Eleven MS still need to improve their recovery performance to achieve the WFD target. Finally, four key CDW recovery challenges were identified: ineffective CDW regulations, incoherent data quality, undeveloped reverse logistics and a low market readiness for secondary materials. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Colecciones
  • Artículos en revistas científicas

Listar

Todo RIARTEComunidades y ColeccionesAutoresTítulosMateriasMaterias UnescoTipos de documentosEsta colecciónAutoresTítulosMateriasMaterias UnescoTipos de documentos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Ayuda

Sobre RIARTEPreguntas frecuentesLocalizar informaciónPolíticasPolítica de Protección de Datos

Políticas Editoriales OA

Logo SHERPA/RoMEOLogo Dulcinea

Difusión de contenido

Logo RecolectaLogo Hispana

Copyright © Consejo General de la Arquitectura Técnica 2018 | Aviso Legal | Política de Protección de Datos

Facebook
Twitter
Contacto Sugerencias