Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLlantoy Huamán, Noelia Karin
dc.contributor.authorCháfer Nicolas, Marta
dc.contributor.authorCabeza Fabra, Luisa Fernanda
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-30T08:26:34Z
dc.date.available2021-09-30T08:26:34Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier.citationLlantoy Huamán, N. K., Cháfer Nicolas, M., y Cabeza Fabra, L. F. (2020). A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of different insulation materials for buildings in the continental Mediterranean climate. Energy and Buildings, 225110313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110323es
dc.identifier.issn03787788
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/1835
dc.description.abstractThe construction industry is one of the less sustainable activities on the planet, constituting 40% of the total energy demand and approximately 44% of the total material use and the generation of 40–50% of the global output of greenhouse gases. The biggest environmental impact caused by buildings is generated during their operational phase due to the energy consumption for thermal conditioning. Hence, in order to reduce this energy consumption, insulation materials must be used and from a life-cycle perspective, the use of insulation materials reduces the building impact over time. This paper develops a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of different insulation materials (polyurethane, extruded polystyrene, and mineral wool) to analyse the environmental profile of each insulation material type in the Mediterranean continental climate. Significantly, all three insulation materials demonstrated a net positive benefit over a fifty-year life span due to the reduced heating requirements of the building. Results showed that the highest environmental impact was associated with the polystyrene insulation material and the best environmental performance was for the mineral wool. Moreover, regarding the consumption, polyurethane and mineral wool had similar thermal performance during the whole year. Furthermore, the environmental payback period shows that the cubicles with insulation material are environmentally efficient, if they are used for at least 7 years (for mineral wool), 10 years (polyurethane), and 12 years (extruded polystyrene). The results of this research give new insights into the effect on building insulation materials. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevier Ltdes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleA comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of different insulation materials for buildings in the continental Mediterranean climatees
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110323
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110323es
dc.journal.titleEnergy and Buildingses
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordImpacto medioambientales
dc.subject.keywordAislamiento térmicoes
dc.subject.keywordCiclo de vida de edificaciónes
dc.subject.keywordRendimiento térmicoes
dc.subject.keywordGestión ambientales
dc.subject.keywordLana minerales
dc.subject.keywordPoliestireno expandido (EPS)es
dc.subject.keywordPoliuretanoes
dc.subject.keywordPoliestireno Extruidoes
dc.subject.keywordPaises mediterráneoses
dc.subject.unesco3305.14 Viviendases
dc.subject.unesco3305.90 Transmisión de Calor en la Edificaciónes
dc.subject.unesco2304.20 Poliestirenoes
dc.subject.unesco3308.04 Ingeniería de la Contaminaciónes
dc.subject.unesco3308.07 Eliminación de Residuoses
dc.volume.number225es
dc.item.number110323es


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record