Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCarrión Jackson, Elena Ángela
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, B.
dc.contributor.authorMonge, J. F.
dc.contributor.authorSaez, P. I.
dc.contributor.authorPomares Torres, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T07:02:16Z
dc.date.available2022-11-25T07:02:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCarrión EÁ, Ferrer B, Monge JF, Saez PI, Pomares JC, González A. Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(11):5823. https://doi.org/10.3390es
dc.identifier.issn16617827
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/2611
dc.description.abstractAccidents due to falls from height are one of the main causes of death in workplaces. Fall arrest systems (FAS) are designed to arrest the fall safely without injuring the accident victim. Their main mission is to restrain the body so as to prevent it from hitting the ground, generating forces and accelerations in the arrest process that are not harmful. A lack of empirical evidence and scant technical information provided by manufacturers regarding minimum clearance distance (MCD) below anchorage makes it necessary to study the safety distances required in the use of Energy Absorber Lanyards (EAL). This paper aims to determine the MCD below anchorage to arrest a fall using an EAL without hitting the ground. The real deformation of EAL when stopping a fall is studied. Ten EAL models distributed internationally by six manufacturers were chosen. Dynamic behavior tests were performed on the samples. Using image processing the total elongation of the equipment (elastic plus plastic) is obtained. The main conclusions are that maximum plastic elongation could be reduced by 29%. The method described in EN 355: 2002 underestimates elongation by up to 70% for some equipment 20% of EAL's exceed the maximum arrest force (Fm) allowed in EN 355. The MCD data provided by manufacturers is not reliable. The data provided by manufacturers are incomplete. It is recommended that quality control for EAL's be strengthened to ensure that products launched onto the market meet the requirement of EN355. The findings of this study recommended increasing MCD distance longer than that calculated according to EN355, at less than 1 m. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleMinimum clearance distance in fall arrest systems with energy absorber lanyardses
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph18115823
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85106659573&doi=10.3390%2fijerph18115823&partnerID=40&md5=ec036c2862a59e51529deafbcdf317e7es
dc.issue.number11es
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthes
dc.page.initiales
dc.page.finales
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordSistema anticaídases
dc.subject.keywordPrevención de riesgos laboraleses
dc.subject.keywordEquipo de Protección Individual (EPI)es
dc.subject.keywordAnclajees
dc.subject.keywordNormativa construcciónes
dc.subject.unesco6109.01 Prevención de Accidenteses
dc.subject.unesco6310.09 Calidad de Vidaes
dc.subject.unesco6311.04 Sociología Rurales
dc.volume.number18es


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem