Reply to Janssen, H. Comment on “Cabrera et al. A User-Friendly Tool to Characterize the Moisture Transfer in Porous Building Materials: FLoW1D. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5090”
Identificadores
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de usoMetadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Fecha
2022Resumen
A significant part of the critical comments by Prof. Janssen, in relation to the work presented in, are based on an assessment of statements that are not really made in the latter work. As it is scientifically inconsistent to discuss issues that one has not stated, the present reply is based on analysing the only three issues raised by Prof. Janssen that are very critical to: the scope of the van Genuchten–Mualem model, the capabilities of FloW1D, and the validity of the parameter estimations presented in.
A significant part of the critical comments by Prof. Janssen, in relation to the work presented in, are based on an assessment of statements that are not really made in the latter work. As it is scientifically inconsistent to discuss issues that one has not stated, the present reply is based on analysing the only three issues raised by Prof. Janssen that are very critical to: the scope of the van Genuchten–Mualem model, the capabilities of FloW1D, and the validity of the parameter estimations presented in.
Colecciones
