Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarrero Meléndez, Madelyn
dc.contributor.authorRivero Camacho, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Rocamora, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorAlba Rodríguez, María Desiree
dc.contributor.authorSolís Guzmán, Jaime
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-11T06:22:53Z
dc.date.available2023-07-11T06:22:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationMarrero Meléndez, M., Rivero Camacho, C., Martínez Rocamora, A., Alba Rodríguez, M. D. y Solís Guzmán, J. (2022). Life Cycle Assessment of Industrial Building Construction and Recovery Potential. Case Studies in Seville. Processes, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10010076es
dc.identifier.issn2227-9717
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/2875
dc.description.abstractIn Spain, most businesses are medium to small size enterprises, representing 90% of the total, but there is a lack of studies of the types of building this sector uses. The main objective of this paper is to present a method for the evaluation of small industrial construction projects to facilitate the introduction of eco-efficient solutions. For this, it is necessary to identify the most representative buildings and the aspects of these which have the most environmental impact. A methodology in place for the evaluation of dwelling construction is adapted, for the first time, to evaluate industrial buildings. The construction solutions characterized are those traditionally used in the sector, as identified through 87 surveys. A standardized classification of work units is proposed to enable the use of environmental product information, such as eco-labels and/or EPD, and LCA databases. The carbon footprint (CF) and water footprint (WF) are the indicators selected because of their straightforward message. Finally, a comparative analysis is performed showing the high recycling potential of concrete and cement which, along with metals and aggregates, control the impact in terms of CF. With respect to the WF indicator, plastic substitute aggregates are among the materials with the greatest impact. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.en
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleLife Cycle Assessment of Industrial Building Construction and Recovery Potential. Case Studies in Sevilleen
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/pr10010076
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122235275&doi=10.3390%2fpr10010076&partnerID=40&md5=f8c88c6f6292b180d087d610d7e21f28
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleProcesses
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordEmpresases
dc.subject.keywordProyectos de edificaciónes
dc.subject.keywordImpacto medioambientales
dc.subject.keywordSistemas constructivoses
dc.subject.keywordImpacto medioambientales
dc.subject.keywordEvaluación ambientales
dc.subject.keywordHuella de carbonoes
dc.subject.keywordHuella hídricaes
dc.subject.unesco3305.17 Edificios Industriales y Comercialeses
dc.subject.unesco3308.01 Control de la Contaminación Atmosféricaes
dc.subject.unesco3305.01 Diseño Arquitectónicoes
dc.volume.number10


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record