RIARTE Principal
    • español
    • English
  • español 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   RIARTE Principal
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Artículos en revistas científicas
  • Ver ítem
  •   RIARTE Principal
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Artículos en revistas científicas
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Organizational factors and specific risks on construction sites

Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/3020
Ver/Abrir: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127334131&doi=10.1016%2fj.jsr.2022.03.004&partnerID=40&md5=7e8a79f92b8308b9400747c864c74360
ISSN: 0022-4375
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.03.004
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Forteza Oliver, Francisco José; Carretero Gómez, José María; Sesé, A.
Fecha
2022
Materia/s

Modelo de ecuación estructural (SEM)

Accidentes

Prevención de riesgos laborales

Empresas constructoras

CONSRAT. Construction sites risk assessment tool

Recursos de personal

Riesgos laborales

Organización de Obras

Materia/s Unesco

6109.01 Prevención de Accidentes

5311.09 Organización de la Producción

5311.07 Investigación Operativa

Resumen

Introduction: This study develops an empirical test of two theoretical models using the approach of Structural Equation Model (SEM) to test the relationships between specific organizational factors of safety management system (SMS) and specific risk variables. Method: Two SEM models with two and four latent variables, respectively, and 10 observed risk variables were used to identify the strongest relationships that may lead to an accident on site. A random sample of 474 construction sites were visited and assessed in Spain from 2003 to 2010. Most of the samples were small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), which is the predominant type of company in the Spanish construction industry. To assess the risk on sites and get the measurements of the variables included in the models, the validated method CONSRAT (Construction Sites Risk Assessment Tool) was used. After estimating the proposed models, an adequate fit was obtained for both of them. Results: Results provide empirical evidence that: (a) the factor “Resources on site” is more determinant in explaining influences on risk variables because of their influence on all risk variables (Model 1); (b) the factor “Site structure complexity” (which includes structure and organization, and safety resources available on site) has a stronger effect on risk variables than other factors related to intrinsic characteristics of the work, site, or companies (Model 2). Conclusions: These results mean that the complexity and resource factors that depend on companies are those that have the greatest impact on risks, which makes it possible for companies to undertake the appropriate risk control measures. Practical Application: These results can help construction firms obtain earlier information about which organizational elements can affect future safety conditions on site, improve those elements for preventing risks, and consequently, avoid accidents before they occur. © 2022 The Author(s)

Introduction: This study develops an empirical test of two theoretical models using the approach of Structural Equation Model (SEM) to test the relationships between specific organizational factors of safety management system (SMS) and specific risk variables. Method: Two SEM models with two and four latent variables, respectively, and 10 observed risk variables were used to identify the strongest relationships that may lead to an accident on site. A random sample of 474 construction sites were visited and assessed in Spain from 2003 to 2010. Most of the samples were small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), which is the predominant type of company in the Spanish construction industry. To assess the risk on sites and get the measurements of the variables included in the models, the validated method CONSRAT (Construction Sites Risk Assessment Tool) was used. After estimating the proposed models, an adequate fit was obtained for both of them. Results: Results provide empirical evidence that: (a) the factor “Resources on site” is more determinant in explaining influences on risk variables because of their influence on all risk variables (Model 1); (b) the factor “Site structure complexity” (which includes structure and organization, and safety resources available on site) has a stronger effect on risk variables than other factors related to intrinsic characteristics of the work, site, or companies (Model 2). Conclusions: These results mean that the complexity and resource factors that depend on companies are those that have the greatest impact on risks, which makes it possible for companies to undertake the appropriate risk control measures. Practical Application: These results can help construction firms obtain earlier information about which organizational elements can affect future safety conditions on site, improve those elements for preventing risks, and consequently, avoid accidents before they occur. © 2022 The Author(s)

Colecciones
  • Artículos en revistas científicas

Listar

Todo RIARTEComunidades y ColeccionesAutoresTítulosMateriasMaterias UnescoTipos de documentosEsta colecciónAutoresTítulosMateriasMaterias UnescoTipos de documentos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Ayuda

Sobre RIARTEPreguntas frecuentesLocalizar informaciónPolíticasPolítica de Protección de Datos

Políticas Editoriales OA

Logo SHERPA/RoMEOLogo Dulcinea

Difusión de contenido

Logo RecolectaLogo Hispana

Copyright © Consejo General de la Arquitectura Técnica 2018 | Aviso Legal | Política de Protección de Datos

Facebook
Twitter
Contacto Sugerencias