Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlves, Zelia
dc.contributor.authorCarvalheira, Joao
dc.contributor.authorSenff, Luciano
dc.contributor.authorLacasta Palacio, Ana María
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Cantalapiedra, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorLabrincha, Joào A.
dc.contributor.authorNovais, Rui M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-22T05:52:36Z
dc.date.available2025-05-22T05:52:36Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationAlves, Z., Carvalheira, J., Senff, L., Lacasta, A. M., Rodríguez Cantalapiedra, I., Labrincha, J. A. y Novais, R. M. (2024). A comparison between the use of cork and synthetic aggregates in the production of geopolymer composites. Construction and Building Materials, 438, article 137147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137147es
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/3639
dc.description.abstractInnovative and multifunctional building materials with low embodied energy and reduced CO2 emissions have attracted considerable attention. Herein, a comprehensive comparison between the use of cork and commercial synthetic aggregates (expanded vermiculite, expanded polystyrene (EPS), and lightweight expanded clay (Leca®)) in the production of geopolymer composites was performed. Additionally, composites containing rubber coming from the recycling of end-of-life tires were also studied. The impact of the aggregate nature and amount on the geometric density, compressive strength, thermal conductivity, sound absorption coefficient, and thermal stability of the composites was evaluated. This investigation demonstrates the feasibility of tuning the geopolymer composites properties according to the envisioned application, cork-composites being the most suitable approach for sound absorbing panels (α = 0.8, 2000single bond3150 Hz), while Leca® and expanded vermiculite containing composites are the best option when considering fire resistant applications.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleA comparison between the use of cork and synthetic aggregates in the production of geopolymer compositeses
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137147
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137147es
dc.journal.titleConstruction and Building Materialses
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordMaterial de construcciónes
dc.subject.keywordEmisiones de CO2es
dc.subject.keywordMaterial sosteniblees
dc.subject.keywordCorchoes
dc.subject.keywordGeopolímeroses
dc.subject.keywordNeumáticoses
dc.subject.keywordResiduos - Construcciónes
dc.subject.keywordMaterial Compuesto de Raiz Polimérica (PMC)es
dc.subject.unesco3313.04 Material de Construcciónes
dc.subject.unesco3312.08 Propiedades de Los Materialeses
dc.subject.unesco3312.09 Resistencia de Materialeses
dc.subject.unesco3312.12 Ensayo de Materialeses
dc.subject.unesco3323.05 Material Rodantees
dc.subject.unesco3308.02 Residuos Industrialeses
dc.subject.unesco2304.07 Polímeros Inorgánicoses
dc.volume.number438es
dc.item.number137147es


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record