Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJorge Ortiz, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorBraulio Gonzalo, Marta
dc.contributor.authorBovea Edo, María Dolores
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-22T05:52:41Z
dc.date.available2025-05-22T05:52:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJorge-Ortiz, A., Braulio-Gonzalo, M. & Bovea, M.D. Assessing urban sustainability: a proposal for indicators, metrics and scoring—a case study in Colombia. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 11789–11822 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02554-6es
dc.identifier.issn1873-1961
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/3741
dc.description.abstractAlthough there are different methodologies for evaluating the sustainability of urban areas in Latin America, they usually apply to a specific city as a whole and cannot be generalized to other cities; besides, they do not address smaller urban units, such as the district, and rarely approach all sustainability dimensions. This study aims to propose a methodology for the evaluation of urban sustainability in the context of a country, whose approach can be adapted to evaluate the urban sustainability of any country or territory, taking into account environmental, social, economic and institutional aspects. The methodology is structured as an ordered protocol in five stages: (I) revision of PROGRAMMES on urban sustainability, (II) revision and cluster of indicators, (III) definition of indicators and metrics, (IV) definition of the scoring method of indicators, and (V) graphical representation of indicators. Accordingly, the methodology was applied in the context of Colombia, particularly to the medium-sized city of Mosquera, as a case study, and both as a whole and by socio-economic strata. As a result, a set of indicators with their corresponding metrics and score in sustainability levels was obtained, as well as a graphical representation that facilitates the interpretation of results and enables the comparison of different urban areas within the city. The results made it possible to identify vulnerable or degraded urban areas, and on a lower level, to detect specific critical aspects that require the implementation of improvements geared towards a more sustainable urban environment. The overall conclusion is that there is room for improvement in the municipality, since its level of sustainability ranges, generally, from 1 to 2 on a scale of 3.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherEuropean Structural Integrity Societyes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleAssessing urban sustainability: a proposal for indicators, metrics and scoring—a case study in Colombiaes
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10668-022-02554-6
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02554-6es
dc.issue.number10es
dc.journal.titleEnvironment, Development and Sustainabilityes
dc.page.initial11789es
dc.page.final11822es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordSostenibilidades
dc.subject.keywordZonas urbanases
dc.subject.keywordHispano-Americaes
dc.subject.keywordEstructura urbanaes
dc.subject.keywordRegeneración urbanaes
dc.subject.unesco3329.08 Medio Urbanoes
dc.subject.unesco5404.01 Geografía Urbanaes
dc.subject.unesco3305.37 Planificación Urbanaes
dc.subject.unesco6201.03 Urbanismoes
dc.volume.number25es


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record