Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBesné, A.
dc.contributor.authorPérez, M. Á
dc.contributor.authorNecchi, S.
dc.contributor.authorPeña Camarillas, Enric
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, D.
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, I.
dc.contributor.authorRedondo, E.
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T07:48:37Z
dc.date.available2026-07-01T07:48:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBesné, A., Pérez, M. Á., Necchi, S., Peña Camarillas, E., Fonseca, D., Navarro, y Redondo, E. (2021). A systematic review of current strategies and methods for bim implementation in the academic field. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125530es
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/4519
dc.description.abstractSince the international governmental institutions required and/or recommended (accord-ing to the regulations of each country and continent) all public works to be certified in the BIM (Building Information Modeling) methodology, public and private institutions and universities have sought to integrate BIM into their production and educational processes. This requires the university academic environment to focus its efforts on training students in this methodology, as they will need to apply it in any future work activities related to architecture and construction. This article seeks to analyze which methods are being used by higher education institutions around the world to integrate BIM implementation in AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) degrees and to determine if a set of regulatory guidelines exists that could serve as a common foundation for institutions to improve this integration process. To this end, a systematic literature review was carried out on WOS and SCOPUS by applying the PRISMA statement methodology. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected based on keywords, abstracts, and full content of the articles. In the end, 23 articles were thoroughly studied, the integration and evaluation methods analyzed, and results obtained. The analysis shows a consensus on the need to develop common academic guidelines across university centers that define a strategy for curriculum modifications and teaching and learning strategies. Finally, future lines of research are identified. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPI AGes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleA systematic review of current strategies and methods for bim implementation in the academic fieldes
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app11125530
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108859780&doi=10.3390%2fapp11125530&partnerID=40&md5=249e2593f653d7d46130ae71b697a6e0
dc.issue.number12es
dc.journal.titleApplied Sciences (Switzerland)es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordBuilding Information Modeling (BIM)es
dc.subject.keywordAplicaciones en educaciónes
dc.subject.keywordBuilding Informationes
dc.subject.unesco1203.09 Diseño Con Ayuda del Ordenadores
dc.subject.unesco3305 Tecnología de la Construcciónes
dc.subject.unesco5801 Teoría y Métodos Educativoses
dc.subject.unesco5802 Organización y Planificación de la Educaciónes
dc.subject.unesco1203 Ciencia de Los Ordenadoreses
dc.subject.unesco1209.03 Análisis de Datoses
dc.subject.unesco6201 Arquitecturaes
dc.volume.number11


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem