Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMellado Mascaraque, Miguel Ángel
dc.contributor.authorCastilla Pascual, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorPérez Andreu, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorGosalbo Guenot, Guillermo Adrián
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T07:48:40Z
dc.date.available2026-07-01T07:48:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMellado Mascaraque, M. Á., Castilla Pascual, F. J., Pérez Andreu, V., y Gosalbo Guenot, G. A. (2021). Evaluation of the Thermal Comfort and Energy Demand in a Building with Rammed Earth Walls in Spain: Influence of the Use of In Situ Measured Thermal Conductivity and Estimated Values. Buildings, 11(12), 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120635es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/4545
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes the influence of thermal parameters-conductivity, transmittance, and thermal mass-in the estimation of comfort and energy demand of a building with rammed earth walls, and consequently, the compliance with standards. It is known that nominal design data does not match in situ measured values, especially in traditionally constructed buildings. We have therefore monitored a room in a building with rammed earth walls, designed a computerised model, and compared four different alternatives where we have changed the value for the thermal conductivity (in situ vs. estimated) and the consideration of thermal mass. When we then analyse the compliance with the Spanish energy saving code, using measured values would result in lower differences with the standards' limits and even comply with the global thermal transmittance (K-value) requirement. This would mean a more realistic approach to the restoration of traditional buildings leading to the use of thinner and more suitable insulation and retrofitting systems, encouraging the use of rammed earth in new buildings, and therefore reducing the carbon footprint due to materials used in construction. Results show that the building model that uses in situ values and considers thermal mass (S1) is closer to reality when assessing thermal comfort. Finally, using nominal data would result in requiring 43% more energy in the selected winter period and 102% more energy in the selected summer period to keep the same comfort conditions as in the alternative where measured values are used.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleEvaluation of the Thermal Comfort and Energy Demand in a Building with Rammed Earth Walls in Spain: Influence of the Use of In Situ Measured Thermal Conductivity and Estimated Valueses
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings11120635
dc.issue.number12es
dc.journal.titleBuildingses
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordAhorro energéticoes
dc.subject.keywordConfort térmicoes
dc.subject.keywordConservación y restauraciónes
dc.subject.keywordComportamiento térmicoes
dc.subject.keywordTapiales
dc.subject.unesco3305 Tecnología de la Construcciónes
dc.subject.unesco3305.90 Transmisión de Calor en la Edificaciónes
dc.subject.unesco3312 Tecnología de Materialeses
dc.subject.unesco1209.03 Análisis de Datoses
dc.subject.unesco3308 Ingeniería y Tecnología del Medio Ambientees
dc.subject.unesco3322 Tecnología Energéticaes
dc.volume.number11
dc.item.number635es


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional