Analytical study on design deficiencies in the envelope projects of healthcare buildings in spain
Identificadores
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de usoMetadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Fecha
2018Materia/s
Materia/s Unesco
1203.09 Diseño Con Ayuda del Ordenador
3305 Tecnología de la Construcción
Resumen
The deficiencies in the design of a building influence its environmental sustainability. In this paper we examine the design failures which are common in the envelope of healthcare centres of Extremadura, Spain, by analysing a homogeneous sample of 17 projects of public healthcare centres sized between 350 m(2) and 3500 m(2). All healthcare centres' envelopes were comprised of brick facades and flat roofs. A total of 344 incidences were found in the sample, related to 51 control parameters. The average number of incidences per project was of 14. It was noted that 29% of the projects reviewed were of high quality, 53% of intermediate quality and 18% of poor quality. A significant amount of the detected failures had to do with the 'omission' of data (39%) or with the lack of 'definition' in the stipulations (25%). It has been demonstrated that larger and costlier healthcare centre projects usually have higher quality designs with fewer critical errors, independently of their geographical location and construction year. This research allows to identify the projects' aspects which can lead to errors in the envelope during the healthcare centres' service life. Furthermore, a tool has been developed to minimise failures in the design stage, preventing their later appearance.
The deficiencies in the design of a building influence its environmental sustainability. In this paper we examine the design failures which are common in the envelope of healthcare centres of Extremadura, Spain, by analysing a homogeneous sample of 17 projects of public healthcare centres sized between 350 m(2) and 3500 m(2). All healthcare centres' envelopes were comprised of brick facades and flat roofs. A total of 344 incidences were found in the sample, related to 51 control parameters. The average number of incidences per project was of 14. It was noted that 29% of the projects reviewed were of high quality, 53% of intermediate quality and 18% of poor quality. A significant amount of the detected failures had to do with the 'omission' of data (39%) or with the lack of 'definition' in the stipulations (25%). It has been demonstrated that larger and costlier healthcare centre projects usually have higher quality designs with fewer critical errors, independently of their geographical location and construction year. This research allows to identify the projects' aspects which can lead to errors in the envelope during the healthcare centres' service life. Furthermore, a tool has been developed to minimise failures in the design stage, preventing their later appearance.





