Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBenito Saorín, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorMinano Belmonte, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorParra Costa, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez López, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorValcuende Paya, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T07:49:38Z
dc.date.available2026-07-01T07:49:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBenito Saorín, F. J., Minano Belmonte, I., Parra Costa, C., Rodríguez López, C., y Valcuende Paya, M. (2018). QSI Methods for Determining the Quality of the Surface Finish of Concrete. SUSTAINABILITY, 10(4), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040931es
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/4866
dc.description.abstractThe surface finish of a concrete element may become an index of its quality, relating the external and internal porosity with the mechanical and durability properties. Few methods are used to determine the surface quality of concrete elements. Mention must be made the Quality Surface Index (QSI) proposes a simplified method to quantify the surface occupied by the pores in relation with the total surface inspected, analyzing groups of pores by their diameter. The method of the CIB W29 (Commission W29 "Concrete Surface Finishings") proposes an inspection of the concrete element and its visual comparison with some standard templates. Finally, the digital processing of images allows the zones with surface defects to be delimited and quantified according to premises of quality introduced into the control software. These three methods are employed in this work and are applied in three concrete walls situated three meters from the observer (M-1, M-2 and M-3). Following the conversion of the results of the method with ImageJ and QSI, the results suppose differences that go from 0.1 tenths (2%) for M-3 up to 0.3 tenths (8%) for M-1. All values are within the obtained range with CIB W29 templates. This can validate the QSI and digital processing methods and allows a quick verification of the results. With the digital method, it is obtained that 23.5% of the total pores of M-1 have a diameter of less than 10 mm(2) and 44% of less than 100 mm(2). For M-2 and M-3 the proportions of pores with a dimension below 10 mm(2) is of 43.1% and 27.7%, respectively, and that 77.5% and 60.7% are smaller than 100 mm2. From all the above it can be highlighted that M-1 is the one with the lowest amount of pores, however the proportion of the largest is greater than for M-2 and M-3. In the case of M-3, although it has a lower proportion of larger pores than M-1, its greater amount means it is the worst in terms of surface finish of the three.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleQSI Methods for Determining the Quality of the Surface Finish of Concretees
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su10040931
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/2490146
dc.issue.number4es
dc.journal.titleSUSTAINABILITYes
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordHormigónes
dc.subject.keywordPorosidades
dc.subject.keywordControl de calidades
dc.subject.keywordImagen térmicaes
dc.subject.unesco1203.17 Informáticaes
dc.subject.unesco3305.05 Tecnología del Hormigónes
dc.volume.number10
dc.item.number931es


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem