RIARTE Principal
    • español
    • English
  • español 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   RIARTE Principal
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Artículos en revistas científicas
  • Ver ítem
  •   RIARTE Principal
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Artículos en revistas científicas
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A comparative life cycle assessment between green walls and green facades in the Mediterranean continental climate

Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/2466
Ver/Abrir: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85109175005&doi=10.1016%2fj.enbuild.2021.111236&partnerID=40&md5=0bcfdf3569ca3796edb7f0ef275f18ea
ISSN: 3787788
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111236
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Cháfer Nicolas, Marta; Pérez, G.; Coma Arpón, Julià; Cabeza Fabra, Luisa Fernanda
Fecha
2021
Materia/s

Clima mediterráneo

Muro verde

Fachada verde

Ciclo de vida de edificación

Gases de efecto invernadero

Sistemas verdes

Impacto medioambiental

Materia/s Unesco

1203.26 Simulación

3103.01 Producción de Cultivos

3305.90 Transmisión de Calor en la Edificación

3311.02 Ingeniería de Control

Resumen

The building and construction sector is a large contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and consumes vast natural resources. Improvements in this sector are of fundamental importance for national and global targets to combat climate change. In this context, vertical greenery systems (VGS) in buildings have become popular in urban areas to restore green space in cities and be an adaptation strategy for challenges such as climate change. However, only a small amount of knowledge is available on the different VGS environmental impacts. This paper discusses a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) between a building with green walls, a building with green facades and a reference building without any greenery system in the continental Mediterranean climate. This life cycle assessment is carried according to ISO 14040/44 using ReCiPe and GWP indicators. Moreover, this study fills this gap by thoroughly tracking and quantifying all impacts in all phases of the building life cycle related to the manufacturing and construction stage, maintenance, use stage (operational energy use experimentally tested), and final disposal. The adopted functional unit is the square meter of the facade. Results showed that the operational stage had the highest impact contributing by up to 90% of the total environmental impacts during its 50 years life cycle. Moreover, when considering VGS, there is an annual reduction of about 1% in the environmental burdens. However, in summer, the reduction is almost 50%. Finally, if the use stage is excluded, the manufacturing and the maintenance stage are the most significant contributors, especially in the green wall system. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

The building and construction sector is a large contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and consumes vast natural resources. Improvements in this sector are of fundamental importance for national and global targets to combat climate change. In this context, vertical greenery systems (VGS) in buildings have become popular in urban areas to restore green space in cities and be an adaptation strategy for challenges such as climate change. However, only a small amount of knowledge is available on the different VGS environmental impacts. This paper discusses a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) between a building with green walls, a building with green facades and a reference building without any greenery system in the continental Mediterranean climate. This life cycle assessment is carried according to ISO 14040/44 using ReCiPe and GWP indicators. Moreover, this study fills this gap by thoroughly tracking and quantifying all impacts in all phases of the building life cycle related to the manufacturing and construction stage, maintenance, use stage (operational energy use experimentally tested), and final disposal. The adopted functional unit is the square meter of the facade. Results showed that the operational stage had the highest impact contributing by up to 90% of the total environmental impacts during its 50 years life cycle. Moreover, when considering VGS, there is an annual reduction of about 1% in the environmental burdens. However, in summer, the reduction is almost 50%. Finally, if the use stage is excluded, the manufacturing and the maintenance stage are the most significant contributors, especially in the green wall system. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

Colecciones
  • Artículos en revistas científicas

Listar

Todo RIARTEComunidades y ColeccionesAutoresTítulosMateriasMaterias UnescoTipos de documentosEsta colecciónAutoresTítulosMateriasMaterias UnescoTipos de documentos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Ayuda

Sobre RIARTEPreguntas frecuentesLocalizar informaciónPolíticasPolítica de Protección de Datos

Políticas Editoriales OA

Logo SHERPA/RoMEOLogo Dulcinea

Difusión de contenido

Logo RecolectaLogo Hispana

Copyright © Consejo General de la Arquitectura Técnica 2018 | Aviso Legal | Política de Protección de Datos

Facebook
Twitter
Contacto Sugerencias