Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCháfer Nicolas, Marta
dc.contributor.authorPérez, G.
dc.contributor.authorComa Arpón, Julià
dc.contributor.authorCabeza Fabra, Luisa Fernanda
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T07:02:00Z
dc.date.available2022-11-25T07:02:00Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCháfer Nicolas, M., Pérez, G., Coma Arpón, J. y Cabeza Fabra, L. F. (2021). A comparative life cycle assessment between green walls and green facades in the Mediterranean continental climate. Energy and Buildings, 249, 111236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111236.es
dc.identifier.issn3787788
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/2466
dc.description.abstractThe building and construction sector is a large contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and consumes vast natural resources. Improvements in this sector are of fundamental importance for national and global targets to combat climate change. In this context, vertical greenery systems (VGS) in buildings have become popular in urban areas to restore green space in cities and be an adaptation strategy for challenges such as climate change. However, only a small amount of knowledge is available on the different VGS environmental impacts. This paper discusses a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) between a building with green walls, a building with green facades and a reference building without any greenery system in the continental Mediterranean climate. This life cycle assessment is carried according to ISO 14040/44 using ReCiPe and GWP indicators. Moreover, this study fills this gap by thoroughly tracking and quantifying all impacts in all phases of the building life cycle related to the manufacturing and construction stage, maintenance, use stage (operational energy use experimentally tested), and final disposal. The adopted functional unit is the square meter of the facade. Results showed that the operational stage had the highest impact contributing by up to 90% of the total environmental impacts during its 50 years life cycle. Moreover, when considering VGS, there is an annual reduction of about 1% in the environmental burdens. However, in summer, the reduction is almost 50%. Finally, if the use stage is excluded, the manufacturing and the maintenance stage are the most significant contributors, especially in the green wall system. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevier Ltdes
dc.titleA comparative life cycle assessment between green walls and green facades in the Mediterranean continental climatees
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111236
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85109175005&doi=10.1016%2fj.enbuild.2021.111236&partnerID=40&md5=0bcfdf3569ca3796edb7f0ef275f18eaes
dc.issue.numberes
dc.journal.titleEnergy and Buildingses
dc.page.initiales
dc.page.finales
dc.subject.keywordClima mediterráneoes
dc.subject.keywordMuro verdees
dc.subject.keywordFachada verdees
dc.subject.keywordCiclo de vida de edificaciónes
dc.subject.keywordGases de efecto invernaderoes
dc.subject.keywordSistemas verdeses
dc.subject.keywordImpacto medioambientales
dc.subject.unesco1203.26 Simulaciónes
dc.subject.unesco3103.01 Producción de Cultivoses
dc.subject.unesco3305.90 Transmisión de Calor en la Edificaciónes
dc.subject.unesco3311.02 Ingeniería de Controles
dc.volume.number249es


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record