Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRuiz Pérez, María Rocío
dc.contributor.authorRivero Camacho, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorAlba Rodríguez, María Desiree
dc.contributor.authorMarrero Meléndez, Madelyn
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-11T06:23:00Z
dc.date.available2023-07-11T06:23:00Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationRuiz Pérez, M. R., Rivero Camacho, C., Alba Rodríguez, M. D. y Marrero Meléndez, M. (2022). Evaluation of Carbon Footprint of the Renovation of Urban Spaces. Environmental Footprints and Eco-Design of Products and Processes, ( pp. , 111-79). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7226-3_4es
dc.identifier.isbn23457651
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/2955
dc.description.abstractThis publication presents a methodology for the evaluation of the carbon footprint of urban renewal projects. New models of architecture and urban environments that are replicated in many parts of the world are notable for the inclusion of plants and trees of all sizes and functions, which can absorb tons of CO2 and pollutants annually and produce oxygen. With the methodology developed in the present work, it is possible to analyse the amortisation period of these urban environments in terms of their carbon footprint by considering the reduction of the impact that is achieved with the increase of landscaped areas. Moreover, the carbon footprint of the construction process from the cradle to the grave can be determined as its indirect footprint. The street renewal has incorporated water-sensitive criteria, with the construction of five green areas, and of roads and pavements. The methodology identifies changes in garden designs, soil drainage, and rainwater-collection systems in terms of carbon footprint. The carbon footprint results from the execution of the work and the carbon sequestration by vegetation in a year, whereby differences are detected between scenarios. Materials and systems can be ranked according to their impact. The indirect footprint increases by a factor of 2.6 in comparison with that of a project without new green areas. However, in the long run, it is possible to triple the carbon capture capacity and halve the direct footprint during the use phase. This balance implies, at the end of the life cycle, that the carbon footprint has been reduced by 75%. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.en
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.titleEvaluation of Carbon Footprint of the Renovation of Urban Spacesen
dc.typebookPartes
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-19-7226-3_4
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7226-3_4
dc.page.initial79es
dc.page.final111es
dc.subject.keywordHuella de carbonoes
dc.subject.keywordRehabilitación urbanaes
dc.subject.keywordProyectos de edificaciónes
dc.subject.keywordJardínes
dc.subject.keywordVegetaciónes
dc.subject.unesco3305.37 Planificación Urbanaes
dc.subject.unesco3308.04 Ingeniería de la Contaminaciónes
dc.subject.unesco6201.02 Jardines y Parqueses


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem