RIARTE Principal
    • español
    • English
  • español 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   RIARTE Principal
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Capítulos de libros científicos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RIARTE Principal
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Capítulos de libros científicos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Evaluation of Carbon Footprint of the Renovation of Urban Spaces

Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/2955
Ver/Abrir: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7226-3_4
ISBN: 23457651
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-7226-3_4
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Ruiz Pérez, María Rocío; Rivero Camacho, Cristina; Alba Rodríguez, María Desiree; Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn
Fecha
2022
Materia/s

Huella de carbono

Rehabilitación urbana

Proyectos de edificación

Jardín

Vegetación

Materia/s Unesco

3305.37 Planificación Urbana

3308.04 Ingeniería de la Contaminación

6201.02 Jardines y Parques

Resumen

This publication presents a methodology for the evaluation of the carbon footprint of urban renewal projects. New models of architecture and urban environments that are replicated in many parts of the world are notable for the inclusion of plants and trees of all sizes and functions, which can absorb tons of CO2 and pollutants annually and produce oxygen. With the methodology developed in the present work, it is possible to analyse the amortisation period of these urban environments in terms of their carbon footprint by considering the reduction of the impact that is achieved with the increase of landscaped areas. Moreover, the carbon footprint of the construction process from the cradle to the grave can be determined as its indirect footprint. The street renewal has incorporated water-sensitive criteria, with the construction of five green areas, and of roads and pavements. The methodology identifies changes in garden designs, soil drainage, and rainwater-collection systems in terms of carbon footprint. The carbon footprint results from the execution of the work and the carbon sequestration by vegetation in a year, whereby differences are detected between scenarios. Materials and systems can be ranked according to their impact. The indirect footprint increases by a factor of 2.6 in comparison with that of a project without new green areas. However, in the long run, it is possible to triple the carbon capture capacity and halve the direct footprint during the use phase. This balance implies, at the end of the life cycle, that the carbon footprint has been reduced by 75%. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

This publication presents a methodology for the evaluation of the carbon footprint of urban renewal projects. New models of architecture and urban environments that are replicated in many parts of the world are notable for the inclusion of plants and trees of all sizes and functions, which can absorb tons of CO2 and pollutants annually and produce oxygen. With the methodology developed in the present work, it is possible to analyse the amortisation period of these urban environments in terms of their carbon footprint by considering the reduction of the impact that is achieved with the increase of landscaped areas. Moreover, the carbon footprint of the construction process from the cradle to the grave can be determined as its indirect footprint. The street renewal has incorporated water-sensitive criteria, with the construction of five green areas, and of roads and pavements. The methodology identifies changes in garden designs, soil drainage, and rainwater-collection systems in terms of carbon footprint. The carbon footprint results from the execution of the work and the carbon sequestration by vegetation in a year, whereby differences are detected between scenarios. Materials and systems can be ranked according to their impact. The indirect footprint increases by a factor of 2.6 in comparison with that of a project without new green areas. However, in the long run, it is possible to triple the carbon capture capacity and halve the direct footprint during the use phase. This balance implies, at the end of the life cycle, that the carbon footprint has been reduced by 75%. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Colecciones
  • Capítulos de libros científicos

Listar

Todo RIARTEComunidades y ColeccionesAutoresTítulosMateriasMaterias UnescoTipos de documentosEsta colecciónAutoresTítulosMateriasMaterias UnescoTipos de documentos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Ayuda

Sobre RIARTEPreguntas frecuentesLocalizar informaciónPolíticasPolítica de Protección de Datos

Políticas Editoriales OA

Logo SHERPA/RoMEOLogo Dulcinea

Difusión de contenido

Logo RecolectaLogo Hispana

Copyright © Consejo General de la Arquitectura Técnica 2018 | Aviso Legal | Política de Protección de Datos

Facebook
Twitter
Contacto Sugerencias