RIARTE Home
    • español
    • English
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIARTE Home
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Capítulos de libros científicos
  • View Item
  •   RIARTE Home
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Capítulos de libros científicos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Evaluation of Carbon Footprint of the Renovation of Urban Spaces

Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/2955
View/Open: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7226-3_4
ISBN: 23457651
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-7226-3_4
Share
Statistics
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Ruiz Pérez, María Rocío; Rivero Camacho, Cristina; Alba Rodríguez, María Desiree; Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn
Date
2022
Subject/s

Huella de carbono

Rehabilitación urbana

Proyectos de edificación

Jardín

Vegetación

Unesco Subject/s

3305.37 Planificación Urbana

3308.04 Ingeniería de la Contaminación

6201.02 Jardines y Parques

Abstract

This publication presents a methodology for the evaluation of the carbon footprint of urban renewal projects. New models of architecture and urban environments that are replicated in many parts of the world are notable for the inclusion of plants and trees of all sizes and functions, which can absorb tons of CO2 and pollutants annually and produce oxygen. With the methodology developed in the present work, it is possible to analyse the amortisation period of these urban environments in terms of their carbon footprint by considering the reduction of the impact that is achieved with the increase of landscaped areas. Moreover, the carbon footprint of the construction process from the cradle to the grave can be determined as its indirect footprint. The street renewal has incorporated water-sensitive criteria, with the construction of five green areas, and of roads and pavements. The methodology identifies changes in garden designs, soil drainage, and rainwater-collection systems in terms of carbon footprint. The carbon footprint results from the execution of the work and the carbon sequestration by vegetation in a year, whereby differences are detected between scenarios. Materials and systems can be ranked according to their impact. The indirect footprint increases by a factor of 2.6 in comparison with that of a project without new green areas. However, in the long run, it is possible to triple the carbon capture capacity and halve the direct footprint during the use phase. This balance implies, at the end of the life cycle, that the carbon footprint has been reduced by 75%. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

This publication presents a methodology for the evaluation of the carbon footprint of urban renewal projects. New models of architecture and urban environments that are replicated in many parts of the world are notable for the inclusion of plants and trees of all sizes and functions, which can absorb tons of CO2 and pollutants annually and produce oxygen. With the methodology developed in the present work, it is possible to analyse the amortisation period of these urban environments in terms of their carbon footprint by considering the reduction of the impact that is achieved with the increase of landscaped areas. Moreover, the carbon footprint of the construction process from the cradle to the grave can be determined as its indirect footprint. The street renewal has incorporated water-sensitive criteria, with the construction of five green areas, and of roads and pavements. The methodology identifies changes in garden designs, soil drainage, and rainwater-collection systems in terms of carbon footprint. The carbon footprint results from the execution of the work and the carbon sequestration by vegetation in a year, whereby differences are detected between scenarios. Materials and systems can be ranked according to their impact. The indirect footprint increases by a factor of 2.6 in comparison with that of a project without new green areas. However, in the long run, it is possible to triple the carbon capture capacity and halve the direct footprint during the use phase. This balance implies, at the end of the life cycle, that the carbon footprint has been reduced by 75%. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Collections
  • Capítulos de libros científicos

Browse

All of RIARTECommunities and CollectionsAuthorsTitlesSubjectsUnesco subjectsTypes of documentsThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesSubjectsUnesco subjectsTypes of documents

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Help

About RIARTEFAQLocate informationPoliciesPolítica de Protección de Datos

OA Publishing Policies

Logo SHERPA/RoMEOLogo Dulcinea

Content diffusion

Logo RecolectaLogo Hispana

Copyright © Spanish General Council of Technical Architecture 2018 | Legal notice | Política de Protección de Datos

Facebook
Twitter
Contact Us Send Feedback