RIARTE Home
    • español
    • English
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIARTE Home
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Artículos en revistas científicas
  • View Item
  •   RIARTE Home
  • 2. INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA
  • Artículos en revistas científicas
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessment of ventilation rates inside educational buildings in Southwestern Europe: Analysis of implemented strategic measures

Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/3017
View/Open: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125286231&doi=10.1016%2fj.jobe.2022.104204&partnerID=40&md5=62b3b55569f7769121d9c7d50978fc72
ISSN: 2352-7102
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104204
Share
Statistics
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Aguilar Aguilera, Antonio Jesús; Hoz Torres, María Luisa de la; Costa, N.; Arezes, Pedro; Martínez Aires, María Dolores; [et al.]
Date
2022
Subject/s

Ventilación (Construcción)

Centro educativo

Covid-19

Calidad del aire interior

Tasa de ventilación en edificio

Portugal

Granada

Ventilación natural

Emisiones de CO2

Unesco Subject/s

1203.06 Sistemas Automatizados de Control d

3108.04 Control Ambiental de Enfermedades

3308.04 Ingeniería de la Contaminación

3205.08 Enfermedades Pulmonares

Abstract

The pandemic caused by COVID-19 has highlighted the need to ensure good indoor air quality. Public buildings (educational buildings in particular) have come under the spotlight because students, teachers and staff spend long periods of the day indoors. This study presents a measurement campaign for the assessment of ventilation rate (VR) and ventilation strategies in educational buildings in Southwestern Europe, Portugal and Spain. A representative sample of the teaching spaces of the Azurém Campus (Guimarães, Portugal) and the Fuentenueva Campus (Granada, Spain) have been analyzed. Natural ventilation is the predominant ventilation strategy in these spaces, being the most common strategy in educational buildings in Europe. VR was estimated under different configurations, using the CO2 decay method. Subsequently, the CO2 concentration was estimated according to occupancy and the probability of infection risk was calculated using the Wells-Riley equation. The obtained VR varied between 2.9 and 20.1 air change per hour (ACH) for natural cross ventilation, 2.0 to 5.1 ACH for single-sided ventilation and 1.8 to 3.5 for mechanically ventilated classrooms. Large differences in CO2 concentrations were verified, depending on the analyzed ventilation strategy, ranging from 475 to 3903 ppm for the different scenarios. However, the probability of risk was less than 1% in almost all of the classrooms analyzed. The results obtained from the measurement campaign showed that the selection of an appropriate ventilation strategy can provide sufficient air renewal and maintain a low risk of infection. Ventilation strategies need to be reconsidered as a consequence of the health emergency arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. © 2022 The Authors

The pandemic caused by COVID-19 has highlighted the need to ensure good indoor air quality. Public buildings (educational buildings in particular) have come under the spotlight because students, teachers and staff spend long periods of the day indoors. This study presents a measurement campaign for the assessment of ventilation rate (VR) and ventilation strategies in educational buildings in Southwestern Europe, Portugal and Spain. A representative sample of the teaching spaces of the Azurém Campus (Guimarães, Portugal) and the Fuentenueva Campus (Granada, Spain) have been analyzed. Natural ventilation is the predominant ventilation strategy in these spaces, being the most common strategy in educational buildings in Europe. VR was estimated under different configurations, using the CO2 decay method. Subsequently, the CO2 concentration was estimated according to occupancy and the probability of infection risk was calculated using the Wells-Riley equation. The obtained VR varied between 2.9 and 20.1 air change per hour (ACH) for natural cross ventilation, 2.0 to 5.1 ACH for single-sided ventilation and 1.8 to 3.5 for mechanically ventilated classrooms. Large differences in CO2 concentrations were verified, depending on the analyzed ventilation strategy, ranging from 475 to 3903 ppm for the different scenarios. However, the probability of risk was less than 1% in almost all of the classrooms analyzed. The results obtained from the measurement campaign showed that the selection of an appropriate ventilation strategy can provide sufficient air renewal and maintain a low risk of infection. Ventilation strategies need to be reconsidered as a consequence of the health emergency arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. © 2022 The Authors

Collections
  • Artículos en revistas científicas

Browse

All of RIARTECommunities and CollectionsAuthorsTitlesSubjectsUnesco subjectsTypes of documentsThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesSubjectsUnesco subjectsTypes of documents

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Help

About RIARTEFAQLocate informationPoliciesPolítica de Protección de Datos

OA Publishing Policies

Logo SHERPA/RoMEOLogo Dulcinea

Content diffusion

Logo RecolectaLogo Hispana

Copyright © Spanish General Council of Technical Architecture 2018 | Legal notice | Política de Protección de Datos

Facebook
Twitter
Contact Us Send Feedback